IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0358599.html

Enrollment in participatory surveillance programs and influenza vaccination uptake: A systematic review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Oluchi Joan Kanma-Okafor
  • Priyanka Ravi
  • Maiya G Block Ngaybe
  • Kizil Yusoof
  • Onicio Batista Leal Neto
  • Deborah Jean McClelland
  • Katherine D Ellingson
  • Chengcheng Hu
  • Priscilla Magrath
  • John Ehiri

Abstract

Background: Despite the availability of effective vaccines, seasonal influenza remains a substantial global public health concern. Suboptimal influenza vaccination uptake is found across many populations. Using digital platforms, individuals can self-report health information through participatory surveillance programs. Though they are mainly used for infectious disease monitoring, their potential association with preventive behaviors such as influenza vaccination uptake has not been systematically evaluated. This review is necessary and urgent given the recurrent influenza outbreaks and the severity of illness due to low vaccination rates. Objective: This protocol details the design and methodology of a systematic review that will assess whether enrollment in participatory surveillance programs is associated with differences in seasonal influenza vaccination uptake compared with non-participation. Methods: This systematic review protocol follows the Cochrane guidelines, is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P), and is registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251274024). Eligible studies will include quantitative comparative designs, including randomized controlled trials, as well as observational and quasi-experimental studies with appropriate comparators. The population will comprise individuals eligible for influenza vaccination in settings where participatory surveillance programs are available. The primary outcome is influenza vaccination uptake. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, CABI Global Health, and CINAHL, alongside selected grey literature sources, without restrictions on language, geography, or publication date. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data using Covidence, and assess risk of bias using ROB 2 and ROBINS-I. Where appropriate, data will be synthesized using meta-analysis or narrative methods. Heterogeneity will be described using I2, and certainty assessed using GRADE. Conclusions: This systematic review will provide an urgently needed summary of evidence regarding the association between participatory surveillance enrollment and influenza vaccination uptake. Findings will inform future research and the development of digital public health strategies that integrate disease surveillance and health promotion.

Suggested Citation

  • Oluchi Joan Kanma-Okafor & Priyanka Ravi & Maiya G Block Ngaybe & Kizil Yusoof & Onicio Batista Leal Neto & Deborah Jean McClelland & Katherine D Ellingson & Chengcheng Hu & Priscilla Magrath & John E, 2026. "Enrollment in participatory surveillance programs and influenza vaccination uptake: A systematic review protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358599
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358599
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358599&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0358599?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.