IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0358575.html

Psychometric features of the Patient-Centered Communication Scale among Iranian clinical nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Ghasempour
  • Hossein Bagheri
  • Hamid Sharif-Nia
  • Zahra Ashrafi
  • Mohammadjavad Bagherian
  • Ali Abbasi

Abstract

Background: Measuring patient-centered communication seems essential from the perspective of nurses as the primary healthcare providers. The Patient-Centered Communication Scale (PCCS) is one of the instruments that makes it possible to achieve this goal. Therefore, since no version apart from the original version of this instrument has been psychometrically tested in other countries, including Iran, this study aimed to culturally adapt and psychometrically evaluate the PCCS in Iranian clinical nurses. Methods: The current methodological study was conducted in hospitals associated with Shahroud University of Medical Sciences. Content validity was examined through qualitative and quantitative methods by specialists in patient-centered communication and nurse-patient communication. Factor analysis, including exploratory and confirmatory approaches, was employed to determine the factor structure and model fit of the Persian version of the PCCS. The convenience sampling approach enabled the achievement of the aforementioned goal by collecting two independent samples of 150 qualified clinical nurses each, totaling 300 qualified clinical nurses. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients, while external stability was quantified by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The expert panel’s comments suggested deleting item 4 due to substantial conceptual overlap with item 5. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a single factor with an eigenvalue of 8.56, explaining 77.78% of the entire variance of the Persian version of this scale. Confirmatory factor analysis also supported the single-factor structure of the Persian version of the mentioned scale. The Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients exceeded 0.70, indicating satisfactory internal consistency, while the ICC value exceeded 0.80, showing favorable external stability. Conclusion: The favorable psychometric features suggest the use of the Persian version of the mentioned scale to identify factors related to this concept in clinical settings and determine the effectiveness of various interventions to promote this specific type of communication. However, the single-center data collection constrains the generalizability of the findings to clinical nurses employed in medical centers linked to other Iranian universities of medical sciences and non-university facilities, including private medical centers.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Ghasempour & Hossein Bagheri & Hamid Sharif-Nia & Zahra Ashrafi & Mohammadjavad Bagherian & Ali Abbasi, 2026. "Psychometric features of the Patient-Centered Communication Scale among Iranian clinical nurses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358575
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358575
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358575&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0358575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.