Author
Listed:
- Ming Fei Li
- Lavania Nagendran
- Christopher Kiru
- Lauren Schroeder
- David R Samson
Abstract
Few studies have examined the nighttime dynamic between humans and dogs, but existing research suggests dogs can disrupt human sleep. In this study, we examined the nighttime activity of 25 Canadian participants, totaling 38 human-dog pairs using accelerometers and survey data. We used linear mixed effects models to assess the drivers of variability in both human sleep and dog nighttime activity, and a generalized linear model to assess the effects of demographic variables on self-reported sleep quality. None of the variables significantly affected objective sleep measures in humans or dog nighttime activity. Dog sleeping location did not affect human perceived sleep quality, but having multiple dogs was associated with poorer subjective sleep (p = 0.042). Human and dog nighttime activities were found to be significantly correlated. Additionally, we conducted a time series analysis to determine lagged correlations between human and dog activities within five minutes. Among the 61% dyads that showed correlation in activity states, human activity preceding dog activity (45%) occurred more often than dog activity preceding human activity (18%). In 36% of dyads, activity was synchronized within the same 1-minute period. Overall, co-sleeping (i.e., bedsharing) had no effect on sleep duration or efficiency in humans or nighttime activity in dogs. The only significant predictor we found was the presence of other dogs, which affected subjective but not objective human sleep quality, revealing a discrepancy between self-reported and objectively measured sleep. Both humans and their dogs impact the nighttime activity of one another, demonstrating our species’ inseparable and reciprocal relationship.
Suggested Citation
Ming Fei Li & Lavania Nagendran & Christopher Kiru & Lauren Schroeder & David R Samson, 2026.
"Who is disrupting whom? Examining the nighttime activity patterns of humans and their dogs,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-14, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0358453
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358453
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.