IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0358323.html

Functional acuity score as a surrogate of reading performance in low vision: A Japanese disability evaluation cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Mieko Tsuruoka
  • Kenji Inoue

Abstract

This retrospective cross-sectional study examined whether the Functional Acuity Score (FAS), an administrative impairment measure calculated from routine visual acuity data, was associated with reading performance in individuals undergoing formal visual disability evaluation. Thirty-one participants applying for visual disability certification at a tertiary eye hospital in Japan underwent Goldmann perimetry and MNREAD-J testing within 12 months. FAS, the Functional Field Score (FFS), and the Functional Vision Score (FVS) were calculated according to the AMA Guides. Their associations with reading outcomes, including critical print size (CPS) and the reading accessibility index (ACC), were assessed using correlation and multivariable regression analyses. FAS was strongly correlated with better-eye visual acuity (rho = 0.963) and showed the strongest associations with reading performance among the impairment measures. It was associated with CPS (rho = −0.82) and ACC (rho = 0.69) and remained associated with both outcomes in adjusted regression models, with R2 values of up to 0.76 after FAS was included. Field-based measures showed weak or inconsistent associations with reading parameters. The cohort consisted mainly of patients with glaucoma and other non-macular conditions (27/31, 87.1%). In this predominantly non-macular disability-evaluation cohort, FAS may provide an estimate of resolution-dependent reading performance when direct assessment is not available. However, only 4 of 31 participants had macular disease, and whether these findings apply to patients with macular pathology remains unclear.

Suggested Citation

  • Mieko Tsuruoka & Kenji Inoue, 2026. "Functional acuity score as a surrogate of reading performance in low vision: A Japanese disability evaluation cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358323
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358323
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0358323&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0358323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.