Author
Listed:
- Debbie Johnson
- Sarah Newell
- Hannah Family
- Madeleine Holland
- Maggie Westby
- Eleanor Franks
- Laura Turner
- China Harrison
Abstract
Background: Pregnancy and neonatal loss, including miscarriage, stillbirth, termination for fetal abnormality, and neonatal death, affects a substantial proportion of pregnancies in the UK. Although the impact on patients is well documented, less attention has been paid to the experiences of NHS staff providing care during these events. Study aims: To explore staff experiences of exposure to pregnancy and neonatal loss, perceptions of available support, support previously used, and needed or wanted. Methods: This qualitative study used a reflective thematic approach. Semi-structured interviewed were conducted with 20 purposefully sampled clinical, allied and non-clinical staff from a single UK NHS trust. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised and analysed using thematic analysis, with themes mapped to the study aims. Results: Six themes were identified: (1) nobody prepared me for this (2) reaching a tipping point; (3) peer support versus inconsistent organisational support; (4) reliance on informal support networks; (5) bereavement team and multi-disciplinary support buffer the stressful effects of loss; and (6) one size does not fit all. Exposure varied in type, frequency, and intensity across roles. Many staff, particularly junior, allied and support staff, felt underprepared for the emotional and communication challenges of pregnancy and neonatal loss. Participants described reaching a “tipping point” where resilience was compromised. Peer support was the most accessible and reliable resource, whereas organisational support was underused despite being valued. Conclusion: The emotional demands experienced by NHS staff are inconsistently supported. Findings highlight a “tipping point” where cumulative exposure to pregnancy and neonatal loss can overwhelm coping capacity, particularly among staff in junior, allied and support roles who often report lower levels of preparation and access to formal support. A proactive multi-disciplinary approach is needed to provide visible and equitable support tailored to diverse staff needs.
Suggested Citation
Debbie Johnson & Sarah Newell & Hannah Family & Madeleine Holland & Maggie Westby & Eleanor Franks & Laura Turner & China Harrison, 2026.
"Examining the mental health support needs of NHS staff exposed to patient pregnancy and neonatal loss: A qualitative study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-15, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0358321
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0358321
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0358321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.