IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0357885.html

How would you like to be helped? A concept mapping study of potential factors promoting integrated approaches for people with mental-health problems to find gainful employment

Author

Listed:
  • Ard J van Oosten
  • Mina Maharadjdin
  • Roland W B Blonk
  • Alex Burdorf
  • Bea Tiemens

Abstract

For enabling people with mental-health problems to find work, an integrated approach is needed. It would combine mental-health services with social services for securing income and social benefits. This study used concept mapping, a mixed-method participatory research methodology that combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to identify factors that would promote such an approach. The participants included (a) experts with lived experience in mental-health problems, (b) client organizations, employers, and the General Employers’ Association Netherlands (AWVN), as well as municipal return-to-work professionals, mental healthcare providers, and the Netherlands Employees Insurance Agency (UWV). Together, they collaborate to guide, support, and facilitate people’s reintegration into the workforce. Participants were recruited between May and September 2018. In Phase One, 63 participants brainstormed how to improve collaboration between the different parties in finding and retaining employment for people with a mental illness. In Phase Two, participants sorted the statements from Phase One into categories based on thematic similarity, and they rated them on priority. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were performed to produce multidimensional maps to visualize the findings. In the brainstorming phase, participants generated 143 statements which were reduced to 60 statements to be included in Phase Two. In the sorting task, six clusters were created as follows: Provide time and space for collaboration, collaborate, provide a safe landing for employees, focus on common goals, facilitate and connect craftsmanship, and address the impact of work on health and recovery. Because experts with lived experience and employers were underrepresented in the development of the concept map, two additional focus groups were organized to verify the results of the concept map. One group included experts with lived experience, and the other one included employers. The results of these focus groups confirmed those of the group concept mapping. Ways to improve an integrated approach are discussed. We distinguished six clusters of potential factors that might foster an integrated approach: “Provide time and space for collaboration”, “collaborate”, “provide a smooth transition for employees”, “focus on common goals”, “facilitate and connect craftsmanship” and “pay attention to the impact of work on health and recovery”.

Suggested Citation

  • Ard J van Oosten & Mina Maharadjdin & Roland W B Blonk & Alex Burdorf & Bea Tiemens, 2026. "How would you like to be helped? A concept mapping study of potential factors promoting integrated approaches for people with mental-health problems to find gainful employment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357885
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357885
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357885&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0357885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.