IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0357819.html

Women’s compliance with cervical cancer screening recommendations and associated barriers to participation: A cross-sectional analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lauma Spriņģe
  • Anda Ķīvīte-Urtāne
  • Ļubova Tihomirova
  • Inese Stars
  • Elza Mikule
  • Jana Žodžika
  • Aija Bukova-Žideļūna
  • Kersti Pärna
  • Mari Nygard
  • Anneli Uusküla

Abstract

Cervical cancer screening (CCS) programmes play a key role in the early detection of cervical cancer (CC) and in reducing related morbidity and mortality. However, both under and overscreening deviate from evidence-based guidelines and can result in more harm rather than benefit. This cross-sectional study is aimed to evaluate the compliance of the CCS target group with the national CCS programme and to identify factors associated with different screening frequencies, including sociodemographic characteristics, health status and behaviour, awareness of the prevention of CC and the venue of the study participants’ recruitment. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,279 women aged 25–70 years residing in Latvia. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess associations between CCS frequency (once every three years, biannually or more often, once every four years or less, and “do not remember”) and independent variables, such as self-assessed health, chronic diseases, smoking and binge drinking, condom use and number of sexual partners and awareness of CCS invitation frequency, understanding of the frequency and purpose of the screening test, and knowledge of HPV vaccination, as well as venue of recruitment of study participants (colposcopy patients or general population). All variables were adjusted for key sociodemographic covariates. Overscreening (biannually or more often), underscreening (once every four years or less), and not recalling CCS history were strongly associated with a lack of awareness about the national CCS guidelines (e.g., unawareness that CCS is offered every three years). Overscreening was more common among participants recruited from colposcopy clinic. The results underscored the importance of health literacy in promoting appropriate screening behaviours. Addressing knowledge gaps through accessible and culturally relevant educational interventions could advance equity and enhance the effectiveness of CC prevention strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauma Spriņģe & Anda Ķīvīte-Urtāne & Ļubova Tihomirova & Inese Stars & Elza Mikule & Jana Žodžika & Aija Bukova-Žideļūna & Kersti Pärna & Mari Nygard & Anneli Uusküla, 2026. "Women’s compliance with cervical cancer screening recommendations and associated barriers to participation: A cross-sectional analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357819
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357819
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357819&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0357819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.