IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0357793.html

Post-occupancy evaluation of former residences of celebrities in Yangzhou based on the comparison of online reviews and questionnaire data

Author

Listed:
  • Kexin Wei
  • Ziyang Wang
  • Xinyu Duan
  • Wei Liu
  • Yueling Xiao
  • Rong Zhu

Abstract

Online review data and traditional questionnaire data are common data sources in the current field of cultural heritage research. The former features a large data volume yet suffers from obvious limitations such as incompleteness, algorithm interference, dirty data and sensitivity; the latter enjoys a high degree of quantification but is constrained by high costs and limited sample size. To explore the complementary mechanism of the two types of data, this study selects 9 national-level former residences of celebrities in Yangzhou as cases and adopts a sequential mixed-methods design. First, content analysis and thematic coding are conducted on online reviews to identify 5 major categories of negative evaluations, based on the coding results, an indicator system is constructed, and offline questionnaire data are collected for AHP-FCE quantitative analysis. The results show that the two types of data exhibit partial correspondence in diagnosing core shortcomings, which, to a certain extent, reflects the inherent logic of the sequential design in which the questionnaire indicators were derived from the online review coding. Cultural expression, interactive experience, accessibility, and signage facilities are jointly identified as the weakest dimensions. Online data provide detailed descriptions and situational characteristics, while questionnaire data reflect the weight and severity of existing problems. Meanwhile, discrepancies exist between the two datasets. Complaints about service attitude appear frequently in online reviews, while this item scores well in questionnaires, reflecting the difference between extreme individual cases and overall public perception. Overall, online review data can truly and centrally reflect systematic defects, possessing unique advantages in capturing specific details and users’ real emotional perceptions. Questionnaire survey data can reflect the severity of problems with strong pertinence through weight analysis. The integrated management and diagnosis framework combining the two approaches provides timely and insightful decision-making support for the targeted optimization of cultural heritage sites, in which the granularity differences between the two data types offer a unique perspective for understanding tourist experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Kexin Wei & Ziyang Wang & Xinyu Duan & Wei Liu & Yueling Xiao & Rong Zhu, 2026. "Post-occupancy evaluation of former residences of celebrities in Yangzhou based on the comparison of online reviews and questionnaire data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357793
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357793
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357793&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0357793?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.