IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0357791.html

Effect of adherence to nutrition guidelines and use of fortification of feeds on the growth of late preterm neonates

Author

Listed:
  • Isabella DeStefano
  • Adanna Ibeku
  • Krystal Hunter
  • Melissa Micallef
  • Alla Kushnir

Abstract

“Late preterm” or “LPT” neonates are generally defined as infants born between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks gestation and constitute approximately 74% of all preterm births. While much effort has been put into evaluating the nutritional needs of early preterm or low birthweight infants, there is a shortage of research on the nutritional needs of LPT infants. This work examined how adherence to current nutrition guidelines and how the use of fortification of feeds affected the growth of LPT neonates in the first year of life. A retrospective chart review was conducted of 898 neonates born between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks gestation, as identified from electronic medical records. The study site where the data was obtained was an urban hospital in New Jersey. Head circumference, weight, and length at birth, documented as measurements, percent, and z-scores, at discharge, at two months, at six months, and at twelve months post birth, were collected and evaluated. Data regarding the neonate’s feeding regimen, caloric fortification, and type of nutrition at the point of discharge were assessed. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests and Mann-Whittney U tests to assess the relationship between adherence and growth parameters. Of these participants, 50.1% were male, the mean gestational age was 34.91 (±1.19), and the mean birth weight was 2317 (±489) grams. Infants with lower birth weight (BW) were more likely to receive fortification (BW p

Suggested Citation

  • Isabella DeStefano & Adanna Ibeku & Krystal Hunter & Melissa Micallef & Alla Kushnir, 2026. "Effect of adherence to nutrition guidelines and use of fortification of feeds on the growth of late preterm neonates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357791
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357791
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357791&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0357791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.