Author
Listed:
- David Coy-Mesa
- Yilsy Núñez Guerrero
- Gustavo Morales-Alonso
Abstract
The sharing economy has transformed access to services through digital platforms and the way people consume them. However, participation remains uneven owing to persistent digital inequalities. This study examines how digital skills and access conditions shape individuals’ participation, with particular emphasis on how users perceive and experience these inequalities. A qualitative approach was adopted, based on two focus groups involving 14 participants aged 25–64, conducted in Madrid, Spain, in July 2024. The analysis followed the Gioia methodology and was complemented by exploratory Natural Language Processing techniques to identify recurring terms and named entities in the transcripts. The findings reveal five interrelated dimensions shaping user engagement with platforms such as Uber, Airbnb, and Booking: usability, technology, skills, trust, and other usage limitations. These dimensions show how limited digital skills, usability challenges, access conditions, security concerns, and additional socioeconomic constraints can restrict participation, particularly among users with fewer digital resources or lower levels of digital competence. The study contributes an empirically grounded, user-centered framework for understanding how multiple digital barriers accumulate and shape unequal participation in the sharing economy. It also connects digital inequality research with platform participation by showing that exclusion results not only from limited Internet access or skills, but also from platform design, trust, accessibility, and payment conditions. These findings provide actionable insights for researchers, platform designers, policymakers, and educators seeking to promote more inclusive sharing economy platforms.
Suggested Citation
David Coy-Mesa & Yilsy Núñez Guerrero & Gustavo Morales-Alonso, 2026.
"Digital inequalities in the sharing economy: A qualitative text analysis from focus groups,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-22, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0357784
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357784
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.