IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0357560.html

An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making and mixed-integer linear programming optimization framework for project risk assessment and response strategy selection: A case study of a liquefied petroleum gas pipeline construction project

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Senisel Bachari
  • Asgar Khademvatani
  • Mahdi Iranfar

Abstract

Effective project risk management helps to reduce negative outcomes, especially in construction projects. Because project risk management involves many different parts, an integrated approach is needed to cover all phases. This study proposes an integrated framework for risk planning, identification, assessment, and response strategy selection, addressing major weaknesses in traditional risk management methods. The framework systematically identifies risks, their characteristics, and their impact zones. These elements help to evaluate each risk thoroughly. Risk assessment is performed using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making, fuzzy SWARA (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) and fuzzy WSM (Weighted Sum Model). The selection of risk response strategies is then formulated as a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) optimization model. This produces an optimal risk response strategy that reduces threats and takes advantage of opportunities. To provide a proof-of-concept illustration of the proposed integrated framework, we present a case study utilizing empirical data from a real‑world liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) pipeline construction project. The findings identify 20 distinct risks and 12 viable risk response strategies. The optimization component successfully selects six out of twelve response strategies. This achieves a 38.9% reduction in total risk value while meeting the project’s constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Senisel Bachari & Asgar Khademvatani & Mahdi Iranfar, 2026. "An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making and mixed-integer linear programming optimization framework for project risk assessment and response strategy selection: A case study of a liquefied petroleum gas pipeline construction project," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-35, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357560
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357560
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357560&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0357560?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.