Author
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the differences in syntactic complexity between academic English translation by Chinese MTI trainee translators (TTAE) and academic English by native writers (NAE). The study is based on two self-built corpora and employs the L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer (L2SCA) to analyze syntactic complexity. The results show that the two groups of texts differ significantly in nine out of fourteen measures of syntactic complexity. The syntactic complexity of NAE is higher in the T-unit complexity ratio, Complex T-unit ratio, Dependent clause ratio, and Dependent clause per T-unit, while the syntactic complexity of TTAE is higher in Complex nominals per T-unit, Complex nominals per clause, Coordinate phrases per T-unit, Coordinate phrases per clause, and Mean length of clause. Compared with native writers who tend to use shorter clauses, more subordinate structures, and more complex T-units, Chinese MTI trainee translators produce longer clauses, coordinated structures, complex noun phrases, and relatively reduced syntactic dispersion. Those findings suggest a syntactic profile that favors phrasal elaboration over clausal elaboration, accompanied by relatively reduced syntactic complexity. The reasons for the differences are briefly discussed, revealing the influence of L2 language development, source -text effect, and translation strategies. This research provides insights for translation teaching and contributes to a better understanding of the syntactic characteristics of trainee translators’ academic English.
Suggested Citation
Jianqi Guo & Yingmei Qu, 2026.
"A comparative analysis of syntactic complexity in English academic texts by Chinese MTI trainee translators and native academic writers,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-17, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0357458
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357458
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.