IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0357289.html

Differential effects of free viewing and goal-directed search on visual attention: An eye-tracking study

Author

Listed:
  • Chenxiao Yue
  • Jiannan Chi
  • Jiahui Liu
  • Yixu Wang
  • Cong Zhang
  • Ming Cao

Abstract

In natural scenes, human gaze behavior is driven jointly by external stimuli from scene characteristics and individual internal goals. To investigate the influence of these two factors on gaze behavior, this paper systematically analyzes eye movement behavior under two task paradigms: free viewing and goal-directed search. First, the guiding effects of different hierarchical visual features on fixation behavior under the two task conditions are analyzed. Second, the differences in eye movement trajectory characteristics between the two task paradigms are compared. Finally, the CNN-TransGaze model is proposed to distinguish eye movement behavior patterns under different task conditions. The results show that shape, location and orientation features exhibit strong fixation attraction under both task paradigms, while semantic features are significantly enhanced in goal-directed search compared with free viewing. There are significant differences in eye movement behavior characteristics between the two task scenarios. Moreover, compared with traditional statistical feature extraction methods, deep learning models can capture latent high-dimensional features more effectively, thereby enabling accurate discrimination of distinct eye movement patterns. Efficient feature extraction from diverse eye movement patterns using deep learning enables the implementation of relevant applications, such as distinguishing healthy individuals from patients with abnormal eye movement patterns caused by neurodegenerative diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenxiao Yue & Jiannan Chi & Jiahui Liu & Yixu Wang & Cong Zhang & Ming Cao, 2026. "Differential effects of free viewing and goal-directed search on visual attention: An eye-tracking study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357289
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357289
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357289&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0357289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.