IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0357231.html

Exploration of acetylation-related biomarkers in osteoarthritis through bioinformatics analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Shuchang Li
  • Jiefeng Yin
  • Jie Huang
  • Xifan Zheng
  • Jun Yao

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized as a chronic degenerative disorder affecting the joints. A growing body of evidence indicates that acetylation may play a role in the disease’s pathogenesis. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely undefined. The objective of this study was to explore potential biomarkers linked to acetylation in OA through a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. We utilized datasets GSE55235, GSE55457, and GSE12021 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by employing the limma package, followed by functional enrichment analyses. By implementing weighted gene co‑expression network analysis (WGCNA), we identified key modules and subsequently recognized acetylation-related differentially expressed genes (ACEDEGs). A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed for these ACEDEGs, and machine learning algorithms were applied to discover potential biomarkers. We established and validated a diagnostic prediction model demonstrating significant diagnostic efficacy (AUC: 0.983 for training and 0.743 for validation). Furthermore, analyses indicated notable alterations in immune cell infiltration through CIBERSORT. Additionally, qRT-PCR and Western blotting corroborated the down-regulation of biomarkers JUN and MYC in OA. In summary, JUN and MYC were identified as novel acetylation-related biomarkers in OA. These findings offer valuable insights into the disease’s pathophysiology and suggest new pathways for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuchang Li & Jiefeng Yin & Jie Huang & Xifan Zheng & Jun Yao, 2026. "Exploration of acetylation-related biomarkers in osteoarthritis through bioinformatics analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357231
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357231
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357231&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0357231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.