IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0357117.html

Transforming GP practices into multiprofessional primary care centers: The role of nursing professionals (PRIMA) – study protocol for a multicenter non-randomized, controlled, parallel-group intervention study

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Naß
  • Wiebke Schüttig
  • Amelie Flothow
  • Marie Coors
  • Leonie Sundmacher
  • Regina Stolz
  • Anika Klein
  • Stefanie Joos
  • Iris an der Heiden
  • Ann-Kathrin Jöchner
  • Hans-Dieter Nolting
  • Hannah Haumann
  • on behalf of the PRIMA Study Group

Abstract

Background: Germany faces increasing challenges in primary care due to demographic change, workforce shortages, and the growing prevalence of chronic conditions. Integrating nursing professionals into primary care teams may improve continuity, comprehensiveness, and efficiency of care, but evidence for the German setting remains limited. The PRIMA project (DRKS00039104) implements a new care model that transforms general practices into multiprofessional primary care centers integrating specially trained nursing professionals. The objective is a productivity- and quality-oriented reorganization of care for patients with chronic diseases. The intervention targets patients with high-risk chronic diseases. Core elements include extended nursing services, subsidiary task allocation within the practice team, structured organizational development, and optional use of a medical triage software. Methods: Effectiveness and health-economic outcomes are evaluated in a prospective, quasi-experimental, controlled study under real-world conditions. The intervention group includes patients from 20 participating practices; the control group is matched using routine claims data. The primary endpoint is the number of ambulatory care–sensitive emergency cases after 12 months, analyzed intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes include healthcare utilization, mortality, continuity, and coordination of care. Statistical analyses will account for confounding and clustering at practice and patient level. The health economic evaluation will estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on ambulatory and total healthcare costs. A parallel process evaluation uses longitudinal mixed-methods. It comprises interviews, activity logs and focus groups, and surveys among patients, their relatives, practice teams and collaborators. Key aspects assessed include implementation facilitators and barriers, organizational development and interprofessional collaboration, nurse role development, and patient quality of life and treatment satisfaction. Discussion: Findings are highly relevant for strengthening primary care in Germany and internationally, where multidisciplinary primary care centers are increasingly promoted. If successful, the intervention could reduce emergencies and improve patient outcomes, serving as a scalable model and informing policy and reimbursement strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Naß & Wiebke Schüttig & Amelie Flothow & Marie Coors & Leonie Sundmacher & Regina Stolz & Anika Klein & Stefanie Joos & Iris an der Heiden & Ann-Kathrin Jöchner & Hans-Dieter Nolting & Hannah , 2026. "Transforming GP practices into multiprofessional primary care centers: The role of nursing professionals (PRIMA) – study protocol for a multicenter non-randomized, controlled, parallel-group intervention study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357117
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357117
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0357117&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0357117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.