Author
Listed:
- Jiyoung Emily Lee
- Dong-Kyu Kim
- Hye Yeon Yoon
- Woong-Joo Whang
- Ho Sik Hwang
- Hyun-Seung Kim
- Reiko Arita
- Eun Chul Kim
- Kyung-Sun Na
Abstract
Meibomian gland (MG) dysfunction impairs the tear film lipid layer, which is critical for preventing aqueous evaporation and maintaining tear film stability. While a LipiView® II-reported mean lipid layer thickness (LLT) of ≥100 nm indicates a high- or ceiling-range device output rather than a calibrated absolute LLT, mean LLT alone may overlook clinically relevant information about the dynamic behavior of the tear film. This study aimed to evaluate whether qualitative variability in 20-s LipiView® II dynamic LLT traces is associated with MG morphology and ocular surface findings in eyes with device-reported high-range LLT values. In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, we analyzed 20-s dynamic LipiView® II recordings from eyes that were initially measured to have a mean LLT of ≥100 nm. Two masked observers classified LLT pattern variability as high or low based on predefined criteria. Clinical and demographic differences between the high- and low-variability groups were assessed statistically. Out of 85 eyes, 58 (68.2%) and 27 (31.8%) exhibited high- and low-variability, respectively. The high-variability group demonstrated markedly elevated meiboscores compared to the low-variability group, indicating a greater degree of MG dropouts (p = 0.042). Besides elevated meiboscores, patients in the high-variability group suffered from substantially worse dry eye disease (DED) symptoms, a trend toward higher corneal and conjunctival staining scores, and significantly increased blinking frequency (p
Suggested Citation
Jiyoung Emily Lee & Dong-Kyu Kim & Hye Yeon Yoon & Woong-Joo Whang & Ho Sik Hwang & Hyun-Seung Kim & Reiko Arita & Eun Chul Kim & Kyung-Sun Na, 2026.
"Qualitative analysis and clinical implications of lipid layer thickness variability: A retrospective, cross-sectional study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-11, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0357020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0357020
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0357020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.