IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0356997.html

Codon bias variation in Staphylococcus aureus

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen O’Connor
  • Benjamin D Mallinger
  • Nicholas A Bedard
  • Robin Patel

Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus aureus causes a multiplicity of human diseases acquired in community and healthcare settings alike around the globe. While most studies focus on coding changes to assess genome evolution and study genetic adaptation, interrogation of silent mutations in the form of synonymous codon usage bias is less well-studied. As such, understanding of patterns in codon bias at the gene and genome levels, and how codon bias impacts protein expression in S. aureus remains incomplete. Methods: The codon bias of 2,565 protein encoding genes from NCTC 8325 was queried against all publicly available closed S. aureus genomes. Using public BioSample data, genomes were sorted by disease state, submitting institution, and collection site. Codon bias was assessed at the level of gene and genome using the codon adaptation index (CAI), calculated using 30S and 50S ribosomal genes. Gene set enrichment analysis was applied to determine associations between physiological functions, CAI gene scores, and interquartile ranges. CAI scores were also compared to an in vitro S. aureus proteomics database to correlate codon bias and protein expression. Results: CAI scores varied within and between isolates at the gene and genome levels. Genes with ribosome-associated functions were most enriched among high CAI genes, and had low CAI interquartile ranges (IQR), suggesting selective pressure to maintain high expression of these genes across all S. aureus isolates. Genome sequences submitted by Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya were most different from others. For the LAC USA 300 strain, CAI and protein expression were moderately positively correlated (cor = 0.534, p

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen O’Connor & Benjamin D Mallinger & Nicholas A Bedard & Robin Patel, 2026. "Codon bias variation in Staphylococcus aureus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356997
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356997
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356997&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0356997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.