IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0356741.html

Multi-model assessment of yield stability in lentil across multi-environments

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Jawad Asghar
  • Maria Ghaffar
  • Muhammad Shahid
  • Khalid Pervaiz Akhtar
  • Amjad Hameed
  • Aqsa Tabasum
  • Ghulam Rabbani
  • Uzma Javed
  • Muhammad Umar Shahbaz
  • Muhammad Kamran
  • Muhammad Ehtisham-ul-Haq

Abstract

Developing high-yielding and stable lentil genotypes is essential for sustaining productivity under increasingly variable climatic conditions. However, strong genotype × environment (G × E) interactions often complicate the identification of widely adapted genotypes. Although several stability models are available, each has distinct strengths and limitations, making it uncertain whether a single model or a combination of models provides the most reliable selection. Therefore, this study compared multiple stability models to identify high-yielding and stable lentil genotypes and to evaluate their effectiveness for genotype selection. A set of lentil genotypes was evaluated across four diverse environments using a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Adjusted mean data were analyzed using the Eberhart and Russell regression model, AMMI (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction), BLUP (Best Linear Unbiased Prediction), and WAASBY (Weighted Average of Absolute Scores and Yield). Significant G × E interactions confirmed differential genotype responses across environments. The Eberhart and Russell model identified stable genotypes based on regression coefficients close to unity and minimal deviation from regression. AMMI and BLUP effectively partitioned G × E effects and distinguished genotypes with broad and specific adaptation. WAASBY integrated yield and stability into a single index and was particularly effective in identifying genotypes with superior performance and wide adaptability. Correlation analysis among stability indices and the Genotype Selection Index (GSI) further strengthened the comparison and integration of model outputs. Genotypes G4, G8, G9, and G3 consistently exhibited high yield and stable performance across environments, with G4 emerging as the most promising and widely adapted genotype. This study demonstrates that integrating regression, mixed model, and multivariate based stability analyses provides a more robust framework for selecting stable, high-yielding lentil genotypes than relying on a single method, thereby supporting breeding for diverse agro-ecological conditions in Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Jawad Asghar & Maria Ghaffar & Muhammad Shahid & Khalid Pervaiz Akhtar & Amjad Hameed & Aqsa Tabasum & Ghulam Rabbani & Uzma Javed & Muhammad Umar Shahbaz & Muhammad Kamran & Muhammad Ehtisha, 2026. "Multi-model assessment of yield stability in lentil across multi-environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356741
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356741
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356741&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0356741?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.