IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0356727.html

Graph neural network-based risk stratification of prostate cancer using gene expression and SHAP interpretability

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Pirmoradi
  • Sevil Vaghefi Moghaddam
  • Mohammadreza Ardalan
  • Mir Mohsen Sharifi Bonab
  • Mohammad Teshnehlab
  • Sepideh Zununi Vahed

Abstract

Accurate risk stratification is essential for guiding treatment decisions and preventing over treatment of prostate cancer, which remains one of the most prevalent cancers among adult men. While the Gleason score, obtained from prostate biopsies, is routinely used to assess tumor aggressiveness, the biopsy procedure carries risks such as pain, infection, and, in some cases, serious complications such as sepsis. In this study, we proposed an artificial intelligence-based framework that integrates mRNA expression profiles with functional interaction networks to classify prostate cancer patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups defined by Gleason scores. The pipeline comprised five steps: (1) data collection from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), (2) preprocessing of gene expression data, (3) two-stage feature selection to identify informative biomarkers, (4) risk classification using a dual-branch graph neural network (GNN) that combines gene-gene interaction graphs with sample-level expression features, and (5) model interpretation using SHAP to quantify feature contributions. Differentially expressed genes were identified in the High (ASPN, GMNN, PEBP4, C2, KNCK17), Medium (C2, IGSF1, ASPN, CDKN3, AMH), and Low (TNMD, VWA5B2, ST6GALNAC5, CYP3A5, PHGR1) risk groups, underscoring the molecular heterogeneity of disease progression. On an independent held-out test set, the model achieved AUCs of 0.86, 0.88, and 0.95 for the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 80%. These results suggest that combining GNN-based modeling with explainable AI can capture both global and local molecular patterns relevant to tumor aggressiveness. However, as the model was developed and evaluated solely on the TCGA cohort, the findings should be regarded as exploratory, and external validation will be required to establish generalizability. Within these limitations, the proposed framework highlights the potential of molecular profiling and graph-based deep learning to support more precise, potentially less invasive, risk assessment and individualized treatment planning in prostate cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Pirmoradi & Sevil Vaghefi Moghaddam & Mohammadreza Ardalan & Mir Mohsen Sharifi Bonab & Mohammad Teshnehlab & Sepideh Zununi Vahed, 2026. "Graph neural network-based risk stratification of prostate cancer using gene expression and SHAP interpretability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-31, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356727
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356727
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356727&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0356727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.