IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0356697.html

Equity in the allocation of oncology bed resources in China: Longitudinal data from 2008 to 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Xingyue Pu
  • Zhigang Zhong

Abstract

Objective: Cancer has emerged as one of the most significant public health challenges in the 21st century. With rapidly growing demand for oncology services, the allocation of oncology bed resources is closely associated with the accessibility and effectiveness of cancer diagnosis and treatment. This study presents a comprehensive assessment of equity in oncology bed allocation across Chinese hospitals, providing evidence to inform policy decisions for optimizing cancer care resource distribution. Methods: Data were extracted from the China Health Statistics Yearbook (2007–2023), and analyzed using Lorenz curves, Gini coefficients(G), and Theil index (T) to evaluate the equity of oncology bed resource allocation in China. Results: From 2008 to 2022, the number of oncology beds in Chinese hospitals showed an increasing trend, but the growth rate slowed down. According to Lorenz curves, the equity of oncology bed allocation by population was better than by geographic area. Compared to 2008, the population-based equity improved in 2022, while the geographic area-based equity showed no improvement. Based on G, the population-based allocation of oncology beds from 2008 to 2022 had G between 0.15 and 0.20, indicating absolute equity with an overall declining trend, while the geographic area-based allocation maintained G around 0.69, consistently showing severe inequity. According to T, population-based allocation demonstrated better equity with T all below 0.1, whereas geographic area-based allocation showed poorer equity with indices all above 0.6. For both population and geographic dimensions, within-group T were greater than between-group indices, indicating that inequity primarily stemmed from intra-regional disparities. Conclusion: While China’s oncology bed resources are expanding in scale, they are facing dual challenges of imbalanced “population-geography” allocation and significant regional differences. We should focus on improving geographical accessibility and regional balance to help alleviate the ‘difficulty in hospitalization’ for cancer patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingyue Pu & Zhigang Zhong, 2026. "Equity in the allocation of oncology bed resources in China: Longitudinal data from 2008 to 2022," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356697
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356697
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356697&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0356697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.