Author
Listed:
- Aisha Abdul Haq
- Sonia Ijaz Haider
- Shumaila Rafi
- Naheed Khan
- Fareeha Butt
- Dur-e-shewar Rehman
Abstract
Background: Innovative modalities have been administered in educating Anatomy to medical undergraduates, specifically Neuroscience because of its clinical significance. For building strong foundation in Anatomy, focus is shifting towards adaptation of digital resources for delivery of content such as three-dimensional (3D) digital resources like 3 D Sectra Visualization Table (SVT). However, lack of dimensional details and relationship of displayed Neuroanatomy images and limited applicability of its digital dissection features necessitate an adjunct teaching strategy to complement the deficiencies in Sectra visualization table. Therefore, to bring about meaningful learning in Neuroanatomy, a model of flipped classroom was designed with existing three-dimensional digital Anatomy resource (3D SVT) and observed the comparison between two approaches on students’ academic performance. Objectives: The study was designed to accomplish the following two objectives: To compare the effect of flipped classroom teaching strategy combined with a 3 D digital Anatomy resource (SVT) and 3D digital Anatomical resource (SVT) alone on students academic performance in Neuroanatomy through pre and post-test scores To assess medical students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom model integrated with digital anatomy resources in the context of learning Neuroanatomy. Methods: A Quasi- experimental study was conducted on two thirty-three medical students. Second year MBBS students were randomly divided into two groups. Group I (Experimental group) was exposed to the flipped classroom with digital anatomical resource while Group II (Control group) was taught through the 3D Sectra session. A pre and the posttest was held before and after each session. A five‐point Likert scale questionnaire was administered to evaluate students’ perception of the flipped classroom integrated model with Sectra (3 D digital resource). In the present study pre and post test scores of students for two groups were reported, within group comparison was made using Wilcoxon sign rank test and between group comparison was done using Mann Whitney U test. Comparison of test scores was also done with respect to gender. Results: The results of the study revealed that after exposure to flipped classroom with 3D digital resource, a significant increase in the posttest score of interventional Group was observed in comparison to control Group post test score after receiving session with 3D resource alone (p
Suggested Citation
Aisha Abdul Haq & Sonia Ijaz Haider & Shumaila Rafi & Naheed Khan & Fareeha Butt & Dur-e-shewar Rehman, 2026.
"Integrating anatomy learning: A comparative study of anatomical digital resource and flipped model with sectra,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-19, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0356693
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356693
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.