IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0356632.html

Exploring sex-specific symptom trajectories in psychosis following metacognitive training (MCT): Evidence from a large-scale retrospective harmonized database

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Lamarca
  • Adrien Goncalves
  • Steffen Moritz
  • Łukasz Gawęda
  • Vanessa Acuña
  • Caroline König
  • Fabrice Berna
  • Susana Ochoa

Abstract

Sex-related differences in the clinical presentation and course of schizophrenia spectrum disorders are increasingly recognized, yet it remains unclear whether biological sex moderates response to psychological interventions. Metacognitive Training for psychosis is an evidence-based psychological intervention targeting cognitive biases associated with psychotic symptoms, but evidence regarding sex-specific treatment effects remain limited. The present study examined whether biological sex influences symptom trajectories following Metacognitive Training in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We analyzed harmonized retrospective data from an international consortium (PERMEPSY) including participants who received Metacognitive Training for psychosis in routine clinical or research settings. The sample comprised 573 participants diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders across different stages of illness. Control group data was not available due to the retrospective nature of the data and a lack of a standardised control group among included datasets. Psychotic symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, including positive, negative, general, and total symptom scores. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to examine the effects of time, sex, and their interaction on symptom change. Across the full sample, Metacognitive Training for psychosis was associated with significant reductions in positive, negative, general, and overall psychotic symptoms. However, no significant moderation of symptom change by biological sex was detected, indicating comparable symptom improvement in males and females across all symptom domains. These findings are consistent with prior evidence supporting MCT as a broadly applicable psychological intervention for psychosis, with comparable symptom changes observed in males and females following treatment. Although sex-related differences in baseline symptom profiles were observed, biological sex did not influence the trajectory of symptom change following treatment. These results support the generalizability of Metacognitive Training and point to the relevance of examining more nuanced sex-related factors in future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Lamarca & Adrien Goncalves & Steffen Moritz & Łukasz Gawęda & Vanessa Acuña & Caroline König & Fabrice Berna & Susana Ochoa, 2026. "Exploring sex-specific symptom trajectories in psychosis following metacognitive training (MCT): Evidence from a large-scale retrospective harmonized database," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356632
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356632
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356632
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356632&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0356632?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.