IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0356551.html

Implementation of objective structured clinical examination among midwifery and nursing educators at South and Central Region Universities in Ethiopia, 2023

Author

Listed:
  • Zerihun Demessie Dilebo
  • Bekana Fekecha Hurissa
  • Kebenesa Angasu Kitaba

Abstract

Introduction: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a well-known clinical skill evaluation tool that has been applied worldwide to teach and assess learners’ competencies in healthcare disciplines. Poor implementation of OSCE can lead to inaccurate assessments and ultimately result in the production of incompetent professionals. However, there is no evidence of the implementation status and factors that limit the much-needed OSCE practice in the study area. Objective: To assess OSCE implementation among midwifery and nursing educators in the South and Central region of Ethiopian universities, 2023. Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study with a mixed approach was used among 269 midwifery and nursing educators and 15 key informants from 8 May to 10 June 2023. All midwifery and nursing educators were included from randomly selected 4 universities in southern and central Ethiopia. Quantitative data were collected using pretested self-administered questionnaires and were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. With a p-value of less than 0.05, which denotes statistical significance, a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Qualitative data was collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using open-code software Version 4.02, and findings were used to support quantitative findings. Results: A total of 260 (97%) educators participated in this study, and 43.5% (95% CI 37.4–49.5) of them had a good OSCE implementation. Training in OSCE (AOR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.03–4.17), having an OSCE checklist (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.05–3.42), having equipment (AOR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.03–5.39) and negative perceptions toward OSCE (AOR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.31–0.92) were significantly associated, and poor organization and planning, perceptions towards OSCE, shortage of resources and insufficient number and duration of the station were found by qualitative study. Conclusions: Less than half of educators have had a good OSCE implementation. Training, equipment, checklists, and perceptions highlight issues such as poor organization and planning, resource, and time allocation stations found as influencing factors. In addition to improving in-service and ongoing OSCE training, it is preferable to ensure the availability and accessibility of resources in the facilities to improve OSCE implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zerihun Demessie Dilebo & Bekana Fekecha Hurissa & Kebenesa Angasu Kitaba, 2026. "Implementation of objective structured clinical examination among midwifery and nursing educators at South and Central Region Universities in Ethiopia, 2023," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356551
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356551
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356551&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0356551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.