IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0356357.html

Taxonomy-free approach overcomes the gaps in ecological knowledge: The case of foraminiferal metabarcoding applied to environmental impact assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent M P Bouchet
  • Fabio Francescangeli
  • Silvia H M Sousa
  • Márcio S dos S de Jesus
  • Jan Pawlowski
  • Fabrizio Frontalini

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has emerged as a cost- and time-efficient alternative to traditional morpho-taxonomic methods for benthic foraminiferal inventories. However, the prevalence of soft-walled monothalamous taxa of unknown ecology, which are largely underrepresented in the barcode reference database, limits the accuracy of eDNA studies. Taxonomy-free approaches, which bypass species-level assignment, may overcome these constraints. Here, we use the case study of the Armida gas platform to confirm the potential of the taxonomy-free framework for ecological quality assessment. As highlighted in a PCA, stations located near the platform (i.e., from 0 to 125 m) exhibited significantly higher concentrations of Zn and Ba in the sediment, while stations farther away appeared unpolluted. Molecular indices based on diversity, e.g., ecological quality ratio (EQR) calculated from exp(H’bc), and a taxonomy-free adaptation of Foram-AMBI (Foram-gAMBI) were applied, with barium serving as an independent indicator for ecological group assignment. The indices EQR (morphology), gEQR and Foram-gAMBI (eDNA) were significantly correlated with Zn and/or Ba, while Foram-AMBI (morphology) did not show any significant meaningful correlation. These results are confirmed by the inferred ecological quality statuses which revealed a clear improvement in benthic habitat quality with increasing distance from the platform when assessed with molecular indices (poor to good for gEQR and moderate to good for Foram-gAMBI), while morphological indices, particularly Foram-AMBI, failed to capture this trend. The weak agreement between morphological and molecular indices is likely due to the greater number of Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (275) than morphospecies (31), including abundant soft-walled monothalamous foraminifera detected only by eDNA. By adopting a taxonomy-free approach to compute Foram-gAMBI, we can fully exploit the metabarcoding dataset without relying on prior taxonomic or ecological knowledge. Our findings demonstrate the robustness and accuracy of taxonomy-free metabarcoding approaches for monitoring benthic ecosystem health using benthic foraminifera in impacted marine environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent M P Bouchet & Fabio Francescangeli & Silvia H M Sousa & Márcio S dos S de Jesus & Jan Pawlowski & Fabrizio Frontalini, 2026. "Taxonomy-free approach overcomes the gaps in ecological knowledge: The case of foraminiferal metabarcoding applied to environmental impact assessment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356357
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356357
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356357&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0356357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.