IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0356356.html

How legal awareness shapes developers’ data compliance behavior: A deterrence theory perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyuan Wang
  • Zhenyang Zhang

Abstract

As China’s digital regulatory framework continues to evolve, understanding what drives software developers’ data compliance behavior becomes increasingly important. Drawing on deterrence theory from a behavioral, law-in-action perspective, this study examines how data legal awareness influences data compliance behavior through perceived sanction certainty and perceived sanction severity, and how perceived compliance culture moderates these mediating pathways. Survey data collected from software developers were analyzed using structural equation modelling. The results indicate that data legal awareness promotes data compliance behavior directly and indirectly through perceived sanction certainty and perceived sanction severity, with certainty exerting a stronger mediating effect than severity. Perceived compliance culture significantly strengthens the effect of data legal awareness on perceived sanction certainty, while its moderating effect on perceived sanction severity receives only limited support. Theoretically, these findings extend deterrence theory to the data compliance domain by specifying the cognition–perception–behavior pathway and identifying the moderating role of compliance culture. Practically, the findings offer implications for how regulatory authorities allocate enforcement resources and how organizations design compliance management systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyuan Wang & Zhenyang Zhang, 2026. "How legal awareness shapes developers’ data compliance behavior: A deterrence theory perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356356
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356356
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356356&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0356356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.