IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0356183.html

What students ask matters: Static and longitudinal questioning patterns in student–LLM dialogue and self-reported cognitive engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Jingru Qu
  • Ling Dai
  • Mengjie Yin

Abstract

This study examines students’ questioning as an interaction mechanism in student–LLM philosophical dialogue and how it relates to self-reported critical thinking (CT) and creative thinking (CrT) engagement. Participants were 106 first-year postgraduate students in a Chinese university general education course who completed an end-of-semester assignment using an institutional ChatGPT model embedded in the learning platform. Student questions in dialogue transcripts were coded into six categories aligned with the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. We then applied latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify static questioning profiles and group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to capture longitudinal development across conversation rounds, followed by subgroup comparisons on perceived CT and CrT. LPA yielded three profiles: Fact-focused, Explanation-focused, and Evaluation-focused Questioners. GBTM revealed two trajectories with a key divergence around Rounds 5–7: some students plateaued at application and analytical questioning, while others progressed toward evaluative and exploratory questioning. Fact-focused Questioners reported lower CT and CrT engagement scores; plateauing trajectories reported lower CT. Findings highlight how questioning patterns are associated with differential self-reported cognitive engagement in student–LLM dialogue and inform scaffold design to promote higher-order inquiry.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingru Qu & Ling Dai & Mengjie Yin, 2026. "What students ask matters: Static and longitudinal questioning patterns in student–LLM dialogue and self-reported cognitive engagement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356183
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356183
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356183&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0356183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.