IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0356052.html

The experience and impact of patient’s suicide on psychiatrists in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif
  • Nur Iwana Abdul Taib
  • Abdul Hakem Zahari
  • Tuti Iryani Mohd Daud
  • Ravivarma Rao Panirselvam
  • Johari Khamis
  • Ahmad Rostam Md Zin
  • Hazli Zakaria

Abstract

Introduction: Patient suicide is one of the most distressing clinical events a psychiatrist can encounter, yet research in lower-middle-income countries remains limited. The main objectives of this study were to examine the emotional and professional impact of patient suicide on psychiatrists in Malaysia and to identify their support needs following such events. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among psychiatrists working in government, university, and private healthcare settings across Malaysia. Participants completed an online questionnaire exploring experiences of patient suicide, emotional responses, effects on clinical practice, and perceptions of the availability and usefulness of support after the incidents. Results: A total of 120 psychiatrists participated, of whom 79% had experienced at least one patient who died by suicide, with 53.7% reporting that the most impactful event occurred within the first five years of practice. Most respondents reported moderate to high emotional impact, with a median rating of 7 out of 10. Over half of psychiatrists (56.8%) experienced a detrimental effect on clinical confidence, while 55.8% reported increased vigilance in suicide risk assessment and documentation. Female psychiatrists reported significantly higher perceived responsibility for the patient’s death than male psychiatrists at the time of the event (p = 0.01). Despite substantial distress, 95.7% of psychiatrists did not take any time off work, and only 16.8% accessed external support. More than half (53.7%) reported being unfamiliar with procedures following a patient suicide. Supportive leadership, peer support, and clear organisational processes were perceived as beneficial, whereas blame and a lack of structured support were regarded as unhelpful. Conclusions: Patient suicide is a common and emotionally challenging experience for psychiatrists in Malaysia, especially during the early stages of their careers. The findings reveal gaps in postvention support and highlight the need for structured, proactive frameworks to support clinician wellbeing and function after a patient’s suicide.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif & Nur Iwana Abdul Taib & Abdul Hakem Zahari & Tuti Iryani Mohd Daud & Ravivarma Rao Panirselvam & Johari Khamis & Ahmad Rostam Md Zin & Hazli Zakaria, 2026. "The experience and impact of patient’s suicide on psychiatrists in Malaysia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356052
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0356052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356052
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0356052&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0356052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0356052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.