IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0355741.html

Phenotypic variation and diversity assessment in maize landraces

Author

Listed:
  • Longxue Wei
  • Lianghai Guo
  • Dongbo Zhao
  • Jianjun Guo
  • Yirong Jin
  • Jiansheng Gao
  • Huini Cui
  • Liang Zhang
  • Peng Liu
  • Zhihui Guo

Abstract

Maize landraces are invaluable reservoirs of genetic diversity for crop improvement, yet systematic evaluation of their quantitative traits remains insufficient. In this study, 119 maize landraces were evaluated for nine quantitative traits related to yield and tassel morphology. Genetic diversity indices, principal component analysis(PCA), cluster analysis, and stepwise regression were applied to characterize phenotypic variation and identify core evaluation indicators. The landraces exhibited substantial genetic variation, with coefficients of variation ranging from 20.73% to 60.96% and Shannon-Winner index from 0.88 to 0.98. PCA extracted four principal components explaining 68.81% of the total variation, with the first component (24.17%) primarily driven by the number of secondary tassel branches. Based on comprehensive D values (0.033–0.960), ten superior landraces were identified, including Z102, Z7, and Z89. Cluster analysis classified the 119 landraces into three groups differing in tassel morphology, grain characteristics, and agronomic performance. Stepwise regression further identified four key indicators—number of secondary tassel branches, angle between primary tassel branches and main axis, tassel diameter, and number of spike rows—as the most informative traits for breeding selection. These results provide a practical framework for the efficient exploitation of maize landrace resources and the identification of elite breeding materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Longxue Wei & Lianghai Guo & Dongbo Zhao & Jianjun Guo & Yirong Jin & Jiansheng Gao & Huini Cui & Liang Zhang & Peng Liu & Zhihui Guo, 2026. "Phenotypic variation and diversity assessment in maize landraces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355741
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355741
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355741&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0355741?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.