IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0355733.html

Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Rapid Mood Screener (RMS-T)

Author

Listed:
  • Chayanis Som-On
  • Chawisa Suradom
  • Roger S McIntyre
  • Sirijit Suttajit
  • Suttipong Kawilapat
  • Sutrak Pilakanta
  • Manit Srisurapanont

Abstract

Purpose: Bipolar disorder (BD) is frequently misdiagnosed as unipolar depression, leading to inappropriate treatment and adverse outcomes. The Rapid Mood Screener (RMS) was developed to improve BD detection, a prerequisite for improving health outcomes in BD. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the RMS into Thai (RMS-T) and to evaluate its psychometric properties in Thai adults with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and bipolar II disorder (BD-II). Methods: The RMS was translated using forward–backward translation and cultural adaptation. Participants included outpatients at a tertiary psychiatric clinic with diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD; n = 109) and BD (n = 31; BD-I = 21, BD-II = 10). Psychometric properties included internal consistency, item-total correlations, test–retest reliability, and criterion validity against the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI-5). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses compared RMS-T with the Thai Mood Disorder Questionnaire (T-MDQ), and optimal cutoffs were determined using Youden’s index. Results: Internal consistency was acceptable for a brief six-item screening tool (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.610; McDonald’s Omega = 0.632). RMS-T demonstrated good discriminative ability for BD (AUC = 0.805), comparable to T-MDQ. Optimal cutoffs were ≥ 4 for BD (sensitivity 64.5%, specificity 78.9%, Youden’s index 0.43). Test–retest reliability was strong. Conclusion: The RMS-T is a valid, practical, and time-efficient screening tool for BD patients presenting with depressive episodes. Further research should investigate end-user satisfaction, the impact on health outcomes, clinical utility, and cost-effectiveness in broader settings and populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Chayanis Som-On & Chawisa Suradom & Roger S McIntyre & Sirijit Suttajit & Suttipong Kawilapat & Sutrak Pilakanta & Manit Srisurapanont, 2026. "Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Rapid Mood Screener (RMS-T)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355733
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355733
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355733&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0355733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.