IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0355712.html

Evaluating employees’ positive functioning at work: Adaptation and validation of the PERMA+4 scales in the Italian context

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Concas
  • Kristina Shea
  • Irene Garigali
  • Andrea Bonanomi
  • Daniel J Martin
  • Stewart I Donaldson

Abstract

As positive psychology continues to gain prominence in organizational contexts, scholars are calling for more cross-cultural investigations into how well-being frameworks translate across different cultural contexts. This study validated both the brief and extended versions of the PERMA+4 Positive Functioning at Work Scale in the Italian context using a sample of 673 employed participants. The PERMA+4 framework extends the original PERMA model, which includes positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment, by adding four additional dimensions: physical health, mindset, environment and economic security. The scales demonstrated robust psychometric properties with excellent overall reliability. For the extended version, confirmatory factor analysis supported both the presence of a nine-factor correlated structure and a Positive Functioning at Work general factor, with the bifactor model showing the best fit. For the brief version, item response theory analyses indicated good item functioning, while confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the expected one-factor structure. Measurement invariance was tested and established for both versions across a broad range of sociodemographic variables. The study highlights that the two versions of the scale present high convergence and a consistent nomological pattern. Both scales demonstrated strong convergent validity through high correlations with work engagement, job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and burnout, and showed comparable associations with work performance outcomes. Moreover, the four additional PERMA+4 dimensions demonstrated incremental validity beyond the original PERMA ones. The Italian validation further supports PERMA+4’s cross-cultural applicability while revealing culturally specific patterns. This research provides both Italian organizations and academics with a comprehensive, evidence-based tool for assessing workplace well-being that moves beyond deficit-focused approaches toward positive functioning assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Concas & Kristina Shea & Irene Garigali & Andrea Bonanomi & Daniel J Martin & Stewart I Donaldson, 2026. "Evaluating employees’ positive functioning at work: Adaptation and validation of the PERMA+4 scales in the Italian context," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355712
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355712
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355712&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0355712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.