IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0355489.html

Healthcare access inequalities in Quilombola rural and riverside communities in the Brazilian Amazon: Associations with social, organizational, and territorial factors

Author

Listed:
  • Leanna Silva Aquino
  • Ellen Mara Fernandes da Silva
  • Julianne Figueiredo Costa Sousa
  • Ednaldo Pereira Maranhão
  • Victoria Valentim Aguiar
  • Cesar Ferreira Fernandes Filho
  • Daliane Ferreira Marinho
  • Sheyla Mara Silva de Oliveira
  • Tatiane Costa Quaresma
  • Valney Mara Gomes Conde
  • Marcos Manoel Honorato
  • Veridiana Barreto do Nascimento
  • Guilherme Augusto Barros Conde
  • Franciane de Paula Fernandes
  • Lívia de Aguiar Valentim

Abstract

Background: Equitable access to healthcare services is a core principle of Brazil’s Unified Health System and remains a persistent challenge in territories marked by social and geographic inequalities, such as the Brazilian Amazon. In this region, vast distances, logistical barriers, and socioeconomic disparities converge to limit the effectiveness of public health policies. Objective: The present study aimed to examine individual, organizational, and territorial factors associated with self-reported healthcare access among quilombola rural and riverside communities in Santarém, Brazilian Amazon, using conventional statistical and machine-learning approaches. Methods: This cross-sectional, community-based cross-sectional survey included 512 adults from nine Amazonian communities. Data were collected through structured interviews and analyzed using Python-based computational workflows. Supervised and unsupervised algorithms, multilevel logistic modeling, and principal component analysis (PCA) were employed. Five predictive models (Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Logistic Ridge, and Logistic Lasso) were compared using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, with performance reported for cross-validation in the training set and the held-out test set. A Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) was derived from PCA. Results: Access and problem-resolution rates varied among communities, ranging from 42.9% to 100% and from 54.5% to 100%, respectively. Predictive discrimination was limited in the held-out test set (AUC 0.482–0.586), indicating poor generalizability for individual-level prediction. At the community level (n ≥ 10), the SVI was negatively correlated with access (r ≈ −0.53). Conclusions: Healthcare access in the Brazilian Amazon reflects intertwined territorial and social constraints. Computational approaches can complement conventional analyses by integrating multi-level information to support equity-oriented planning in remote settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Leanna Silva Aquino & Ellen Mara Fernandes da Silva & Julianne Figueiredo Costa Sousa & Ednaldo Pereira Maranhão & Victoria Valentim Aguiar & Cesar Ferreira Fernandes Filho & Daliane Ferreira Marinho , 2026. "Healthcare access inequalities in Quilombola rural and riverside communities in the Brazilian Amazon: Associations with social, organizational, and territorial factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355489
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355489
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355489&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0355489?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.