IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0355480.html

Comparison of inhomogeneous Schottky barrier modeling approaches in SiC polytypes

Author

Listed:
  • Fayssal Mekaret
  • Abdelaziz Rabehi
  • Baya Zebentout
  • Shahrazade Tizi
  • Abdelmalek Douara
  • Mawloud Guermoui
  • Imad Eddine Tibermacine
  • Amal H Alharbi
  • El-Sayed M El-kenawy
  • Mustapha Habib
  • Zineb Benamara

Abstract

This work presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of Schottky barrier (SB) inhomogeneities in three SiC polytypes (3C, 4H, and 6H) using three established theoretical approaches: the Cowley and Sze interface state model, the Werner Gaussian distribution model, and the Tung localized patch model. Through analytical simulations performed in MATLAB, we examined how each model’s intrinsic parameters, including the interface state density (Nss), the standard deviation (σ), and the inhomogeneity parameter (γ), influence the effective Schottky barrier height (SBH) and the corresponding I–V characteristics predicted by each model. Our results demonstrate that each model reveals a distinct physical mechanism governing charge transport at the metal/semiconductor interface. The Cowley and Sze model emphasizes Fermi-level pinning due to interface states, Werner’s model accounts for statistical fluctuations of the barrier height, and Tung’s model describes localized current flow through low-barrier patches. Even though the numerical values obtained for each case are different, Although the three SiC polytypes exhibit different quantitative responses, they all show thermally activated transport behavior. These findings provide valuable guidelines for optimizing Schottky contact performance in high- temperature SiC power devices. The proposed comparative framework serves as a predictive tool for designing, engineering, and improving metal/SiC interfaces in advanced power device technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fayssal Mekaret & Abdelaziz Rabehi & Baya Zebentout & Shahrazade Tizi & Abdelmalek Douara & Mawloud Guermoui & Imad Eddine Tibermacine & Amal H Alharbi & El-Sayed M El-kenawy & Mustapha Habib & Zineb , 2026. "Comparison of inhomogeneous Schottky barrier modeling approaches in SiC polytypes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355480
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355480
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355480&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0355480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.