IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0355476.html

The use of artificial intelligence models for interpretation and triage of clinical referral letters to acute and specialist care pathways: Protocol for a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • James Foley
  • Enda Hession
  • Etimbuk Umana
  • Fiona Boland

Abstract

Background: Clinical referral letters direct patients into acute, urgent, and specialist care pathways, but their triage is typically manual, heterogeneous, and resource intensive, contributing to waiting-list pressure and potential patient harm. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods, including natural language processing, machine learning, and large language models, offer potential to automate or augment referral triage, yet the performance, safety, and implementation characteristics of AI applied to referral documentation have not been systematically synthesised. A February 2026 PROSPERO search identified no completed or ongoing systematic reviews addressing this question. Objectives: To evaluate the prioritisation performance of AI models used to triage clinical referral documentation for acute and specialist care pathways, and to map how this emerging field defines and evaluates AI-assisted referral triage, including model types, reference standards, validation practices, safety outcomes, and implementation-related outcomes. Methods: This protocol is reported in accordance with PRISMA-P. Systematic searches will be undertaken in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, covering January 2016 to the 5 May 2026, with no language restrictions. Eligible studies will include diagnostic accuracy, model development and validation, and comparative studies that apply an AI model to referral documentation and report at least one triage-performance outcome. Two reviewers will independently screen, extract data, and assess risk of bias using PROBAST-AI as appropriate. A structured narrative synthesis and evidence map using the SWiM reporting guideline will be the primary synthesis output, stratified by AI model class and clinical pathway. Meta-analysis will be treated as conditional and exploratory, and will be undertaken only where studies report comparable outcomes using a similar model class, clinical setting, reference standard, outcome definition, and threshold structure. Expected outcomes and significance: This review will produce the first systematic synthesis and evidence map of AI-assisted referral triage across acute and specialist care pathways, characterising how the field defines and evaluates this task as well as what is currently known about prioritisation performance. Findings will inform clinicians, service planners, and policymakers considering AI adoption in referral workflows, and will identify methodological priorities for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • James Foley & Enda Hession & Etimbuk Umana & Fiona Boland, 2026. "The use of artificial intelligence models for interpretation and triage of clinical referral letters to acute and specialist care pathways: Protocol for a systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355476
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355476
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355476&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0355476?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.