IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0355462.html

Who considers alternative employment pathways among International Medical Graduates in Canada?

Author

Listed:
  • Tanvir C Turin
  • Nashit Chowdhury
  • Deidre Lake
  • Mohammad Z I Chowdhury

Abstract

This study aims to examine which International Medical Graduates (IMGs) consider alternative employment pathways in Canada. IMGs are physicians whose country of practice differs from the country where they obtained their primary medical qualification. Due to the limitations and uncertainties of this career pathway, many IMGs opt for alternative career pathways (ACPs), which include non-physician roles that enable IMGs to apply their transferable knowledge, skills, and experience. This study aimed to analyze which IMGs choose alternative careers for job market integration in Canada. We carried out an anonymous, open online survey of IMGs living in Canada between November 2019 and June 2020. We recruited through IMGs-serving organizations, professional networks, social media platforms, and IMG champions. The survey collected information on sociodemographic characteristics, professional background, and consideration of ACPs. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with ACP consideration. Of the 1,740 survey responses received, 1,210 respondents with complete information on the primary outcome were included in the analysis. Thus, the final sample used for this analysis included 1,210 responses from IMGs who were not currently working in clinical settings as partially/fully licensed physicians and who provided responses to our key question about considering ACPs. This sample included both those considering ACPs (683 respondents, 56.45%) and those not considering ACPs (527 respondents, 43.55%), enabling comparison between these two groups of IMGs in Canada. Among participants aged ≥ 50 years, the majority were considering ACPs (75.65%). Compared to migrants who had been in Canada for 15 years) were less likely to consider ACP, OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.47–1.43. An opposite trend in ACP consideration was observed between graduates within 15 years), OR: 3.41, 95% CI: 1.39–8.38. Despite persistent barriers and low residency match (13%−18%) in Canada, more than half of respondents reported considering alternative career pathways. IMGs aged 50 or older and those with longer time since graduation were more likely to consider alternative careers, whereas gender and length of stay in Canada were not significantly associated with ACP consideration. These insights from this study can guide targeted future support and career strategies to better facilitate IMGs’ professional integration into the Canadian workforce, supporting their transition to fulfilling and meaningful employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanvir C Turin & Nashit Chowdhury & Deidre Lake & Mohammad Z I Chowdhury, 2026. "Who considers alternative employment pathways among International Medical Graduates in Canada?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355462
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355462
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355462&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0355462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.