Author
Listed:
- Abedallah Zaid Abualkishik
- Adel Khelifi
- Ibtesam Mohammed Alawadhi
- Ali A Alwan
- Mohamed Elhoseny
Abstract
Composite indices of national capability reduce dynamic trajectories to static rankings, offering no mechanism to distinguish expected persistence from departures that warrant diagnostic attention. This study asks when a year-to-year change in a national AI-readiness score warrants additional analytical attention. We develop a five-step diagnostic framework (Expect, Detect, Explain, Contextualise, Interpret & Investigate) and apply it to the Oxford Government AI Readiness Index (118 countries, 2021–2024) across two transition windows. An autoregressive baseline explains 97.9% of the variation in next-year scores (W1 in-sample R² = 0.9790, MAE = 1.6506), establishing persistence as the dominant structure and residuals as the primary analytical unit; under a common held-out protocol no flexible specification improves on that baseline, so pillar disaggregation is used for attribution rather than prediction. Government is the pillar most frequently selected by the attribution rule among flagged deviations, with wide uncertainty and a threshold-sensitive ranking (50.0% in W1, 45.8% in W2 after normalisation; Wilson 95% CI 31–69% in W1). Regime analysis defines three Level-dominated readiness strata (k-means, k = 3; W1 trajectory stability ratio, TSR = 0.9407); the W1 directional differentiation in ΔLevel (p = 0.0020) is consistent with mean reversion under the below-unity AR(1) slope (0.954), with the regime term non-significant once continuous prior score is controlled (ANCOVA p = 0.389), and the W2 non-recurrence (p = 0.3643) coincides with a slope near unity (1.007). The regime typology therefore serves as an interpretive stratification device rather than an independent source of trajectory differentiation. Zero skip-a-level movements occur in both windows, consistent with strong persistence rather than independent evidence of ordered mobility. By screening departures from expected persistence using a signed-decile rule with window-specific cut-points (24 of 118 observations flagged per window by construction), the framework reconceptualises composite indices as state-dependent diagnostic systems and supports targeted follow-up monitoring.
Suggested Citation
Abedallah Zaid Abualkishik & Adel Khelifi & Ibtesam Mohammed Alawadhi & Ali A Alwan & Mohamed Elhoseny, 2026.
"Distinguishing persistence from deviation in composite policy indices: A diagnostic framework for AI readiness trajectory screening and stratification,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(11), pages 1-27, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0355152
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355152
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.