Author
Listed:
- Yun Qin
- Zhiyi Zeng
- Keyao Qin
- Jiexi Xiong
- Xiang Yan
Abstract
Intangible cultural heritage (ICH) exhibits pronounced spatial unevenness, yet the spatial patterns and driving mechanisms of traditional drama as a form of living performing heritage remain insufficiently understood. Taking Southwest China as a case, this study analyzes 257 traditional drama ICH items, comprising 54 national-level and 203 provincial-level items. Using kernel density estimation, nearest neighbor index, standard deviational ellipse, and the geographical detector methods, we examine spatial distribution, typological differentiation, temporal evolution, and influencing factors. The results show that: (1) traditional drama ICH displays a “dense in eastern section while sparse in western section” pattern, with core clusters in eastern Guizhou and the Sichuan–Chongqing–Guizhou border region; (2) clear typological differences exist, with Dengxi Opera, Tibetan Opera, and small-scale dramas (Others) showing clustered patterns, while Sichuan Opera, Di Opera, and shadow puppetry are more dispersed; (3) from 2006 to 2025, the spatial pattern evolves from scattered distribution to multi-core agglomeration, with a relatively stable gravity center in the Sichuan–Chongqing–Guizhou border area; and (4) terrain, traditional villages, and cultural institutions are the main driving factors, with interaction effects enhancing explanatory power, while economic and urbanization variables show no significant independent effects. This study responds to critiques of spatial disconnection from ICH’s living attributes and integrates cultural ecology, therapeutic arts, and digital heritage perspectives. It provides empirical support for the spatial governance and living preservation of performing ICH.
Suggested Citation
Yun Qin & Zhiyi Zeng & Keyao Qin & Jiexi Xiong & Xiang Yan, 2026.
"Uneven development of intangible cultural heritage: A spatial analysis of traditional drama in Southwestern China,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-18, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0355102
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355102
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.