IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0355048.html

Navigating complexity: Evaluating management measures for multispecies snapper-grouper fisheries in the Southeast U.S. Atlantic

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Cao
  • Kyle Shertzer
  • Scott Crosson
  • Erik Williams
  • Rick DeVictor

Abstract

Multispecies fisheries are globally common, but typically managed through single-species controls. This situation can result in wasteful discarding, when fish of some species cannot be retained, but fishing effort toward the complex continues. In contrast, managing multispecies fisheries through effort controls can address this shortcoming. In this study, we used a simulation model to examine the effectiveness of various temporal and spatial effort controls applied to the multispecies snapper-grouper fishery in the southeast United States Atlantic. To represent the complex, we chose six species that are most commonly caught by the commercial and recreational sectors. We evaluated the various management scenarios based on performance metrics that quantify effects on spawning biomass, commercial and recreational landings, commercial and recreational discards, and economic indicators for both fishing sectors. These performance metrics were applied to both the species individually and in aggregate. We found that some management approaches were more effective than others, but that no single approach worked best for all species and both sectors. The optimal strategy depends on policy priorities, balancing potential tradeoffs between conservation goals (e.g., increased spawning biomass), harvest objectives (e.g., increased landings, decreased discards), and economic outcomes. Our modeling framework quantifies those tradeoffs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Cao & Kyle Shertzer & Scott Crosson & Erik Williams & Rick DeVictor, 2026. "Navigating complexity: Evaluating management measures for multispecies snapper-grouper fisheries in the Southeast U.S. Atlantic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355048
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355048&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0355048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.