Author
Listed:
- Lisa Langsetmo
- John T Schousboe
- Allyson M Kats
- Brent C Taylor
- Cynthia M Boyd
- Kerry M Sheets
- Kristine Ensrud
Abstract
Background: In a pooled analysis of 4 prospective cohort studies linked with Medicare claims (2002–2011), claims-derived predictors and cohort-derived functional impairments and phenotypic frailty were associated with higher subsequent healthcare expenditures in community-dwelling beneficiaries. Objective: Determine calibration and discrimination of published cost prediction models among a nationally representative sample of US community-dwelling older adults in an independent sample (external validation) and at a different time-point (temporal validation). Design: Prospective cohort study Setting: National Healthy Aging and Trends Study (NHATS) 2015 cohort Participants: 3,322 community-dwelling NHATS participants enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service. Measurements: Self-reported functional impairments (difficulty performing four activities of daily living) and frailty phenotype (operationalized using five components) derived from cohort data. Weighted (CMS Hierarchical Conditions Categories index) and unweighted (count of conditions) multimorbidity measures and frailty index derived from claims. Annualized healthcare costs ascertained for 36 months following 2015 examination. Cost ratios estimated from generalized linear models stratified by sex and adjusted for geographic region. Model calibration (predicted vs. observed costs by quintile) and discrimination (area under curve [AUC]) assessed. Results: In external and temporal validation cohorts, calibration was acceptable for all models with substantial agreement between predicted and observed costs. In the external cohort, the full model including claims- and cohort-derived variables had AUC = 0.78, 95% CI (0.74–0.82) in women and AUC = 0.77, 95% CI (0.73–0.81) in men, slightly higher than models limited to only claims-derived variables. Similar findings were noted in the temporal validation cohort. Conclusions: Performance of a model predicting total healthcare costs including self-reported functional impairments and phenotypic frailty together with claims-derived cost indicators is similar in a new independent cohort and in a subset of the original cohort at a later time-point. These results support clinical assessment of these geriatric syndromes for predicting risk of subsequent healthcare burden.
Suggested Citation
Lisa Langsetmo & John T Schousboe & Allyson M Kats & Brent C Taylor & Cynthia M Boyd & Kerry M Sheets & Kristine Ensrud, 2026.
"External validation of model predicting healthcare costs using cohort study-derived and claims-derived predictor variables in community-dwelling older adults,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-15, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0354978
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354978
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.