IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354801.html

Treatment of Toddler’s Fractures: Study protocol for a multicentre non-inferiority RCT of no-immobilisation or immobilisation

Author

Listed:
  • Katie Ridsdale
  • Shammi Ramlakhan
  • Ines Rombach
  • Chris Turtle
  • Steve Goodacre
  • Daniel C Perry
  • Lizzie Swaby
  • Joshua Milner
  • Anju Keetharuth
  • Muniba Aslam
  • Richard Napier
  • Robin Chatters
  • Fay Benskin
  • Sheryl Bennett
  • Nicolas Nicolaou
  • on behalf of the ToTs Study Group

Abstract

Aims: Toddler’s fractures are non-displaced spiral fractures of the lower third of the tibia which are usually sustained during a minor fall. These fractures are surrounded by a thick outer lining of bone (the periosteum), which typically makes them stable. Treatment approaches vary; most clinicians use casts or boots to immobilise the leg, whereas others observe recovery without immobilisation. Both approaches are thought to be safe. Whilst immobilisation protects the leg, it can cause issues with stiffness, recovery and complications. The aim of the ToTs study is to determine whether no-immobilisation is non-inferior to immobilisation in young children with toddler’s fractures. Methods: This randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 494 participants aged 9 months up to their 4th birthday, who present with clinically suspected or radiologically confirmed toddler’s fractures. Most participants are expected to be recruited from emergency departments or fracture clinics. Patients will be randomly allocated 1:1, to either immobilisation or no-immobilisation. The primary outcome is the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) behavioural pain assessment completed by parents/guardians at 7 days post randomisation. The primary comparison will assess non-inferiority using a margin of 1 point on the FLACC scale. Secondary outcomes include pain at 3 and 28 days, hospital attendances, need for treatment of pressure ulcers and fracture displacement after randomisation, recovery of mobility, analgesic use, resource use, and satisfaction, collected either by review of medical notes at 28 days, or parent/guardian questionnaires. The cost-effectiveness of the different treatment strategies will also be assessed. Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement informed the study design and will assist with aspects of trial delivery and dissemination. Discussion: The ToTs trial addresses a lack of high-level evidence regarding the management of toddler’s fractures. This will generate evidence to guide clinical practice regarding whether these fractures should be immobilised.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie Ridsdale & Shammi Ramlakhan & Ines Rombach & Chris Turtle & Steve Goodacre & Daniel C Perry & Lizzie Swaby & Joshua Milner & Anju Keetharuth & Muniba Aslam & Richard Napier & Robin Chatters & Fa, 2026. "Treatment of Toddler’s Fractures: Study protocol for a multicentre non-inferiority RCT of no-immobilisation or immobilisation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354801
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354801
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354801&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354801?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.