Author
Abstract
“V+ Xia (下)”, “V+ Xialai (下来)” and “V+ Xiaqu (下去)” are common verb-direction constructions in Mandarin Chinese, exhibiting certain similarities in syntactic distribution and semantic content. Employing collostructional analysis, this study quantitatively and visually calculates the collocational strength and attraction between different types of verbs and these verb-direction constructions. It analyzes the polysemy of the three constructions, summarizes the differences in their prototype meaning, and examines the distribution of collocational strength and relative semantic distance between prototypical and non-prototype meanings. Furthermore, it explores the characteristics of the semantic network structures presented by the three constructions. The findings indicate that “V+ Xialai” possesses the largest number of attracted verbs, the broadest verb selection range, and the highest productivity among the three constructions. “V+ Xia”, constrained by prosody, exhibits the lowest productivity but the highest average collocational strength. “V+ Xia” has the highest number of semantic types with a relatively uniform distribution of collocational strength, whereas the distributions for “V+ Xialai” and “V+ Xiaqu” are more concentrated around their prototype meanings. The semantic networks of “V+ Xia” and “V+ Xiaqu” overall display a gradient continuum, while that of “V+ Xialai” is relatively discrete, with certain semantic types showing a tendency to form independent clusters. The prototype meanings of all three constructions demonstrate strong semantic coherence. Non-prototype meanings with high collocational strength also exhibit relatively strong internal coherence, while those with low collocational strength are more discrete, displaying characteristics of diversity.
Suggested Citation
Tian Tan & Jiangcai Li, 2026.
"Quantitative comparative study on the verb-direction constructions “V+ Xia (下)”, “V+ Xialai (下来)” and “V+ Xiaqu (下去)” in mandarin Chinese,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-23, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0354793
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354793
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.