Author
Listed:
- Karlijn Demers
- Sander M J van Kuijk
- Marieke J Pierik
- Daisy M A E Jonkers
- Laurents P S Stassen
- Bart C Bongers
Abstract
Purpose: To develop predictive equations for oxygen uptake at peak exercise (VO2peak) measured during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using submaximal CPET-derived parameters and the steep ramp test, along with demographic and clinical characteristics. Methods: This study included patients with IBD in remission or with mild-to-moderate disease activity who performed a CPET and a steep ramp test within 14 days. Submaximal CPET-derived parameters included oxygen uptake (VO2) at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), while the outcome of the steep ramp test was the work rate achieved at peak exercise (WRpeak). Results: Predictive regression equations with submaximal VO2 at the VAT and with OUES, when combined with age and body fat percentage, explained >89% of the variance in VO2peak (optimism-adjusted R2 = 0.895 and 0.938). Predictive capacity increased when both VO2 at the VAT and OUES were combined in a predictive regression equation, together with age, body fat percentage, and clinically active disease (optimism-adjusted R2 = 0.951). Steep ramp test WRpeak explained 89% of the variance in VO2peak (optimism-adjusted R2 = 0.892). Conclusion: The highly predictive equations developed in this study support the use of the submaximal CPET and the steep ramp test as alternatives for assessing VO2peak in patients with IBD in remission or with mild-to-moderate disease activity in clinical and research settings.
Suggested Citation
Karlijn Demers & Sander M J van Kuijk & Marieke J Pierik & Daisy M A E Jonkers & Laurents P S Stassen & Bart C Bongers, 2026.
"Prediction of oxygen uptake at peak exercise in patients with inflammatory bowel disease using submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and the steep ramp test as a practical field test,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(10), pages 1-11, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0354707
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354707
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.