IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354633.html

A cross-sectional validation study of the verran and snyder-halpern sleep scale and the factors influencing sleep questionnaire in Dutch hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Christel T A J Derks
  • Jessica J J Cramer-Kruit
  • Paul Lodder
  • RENurse Consortium
  • Annemarie J B M de Vos
  • Catharina J van Oostveen

Abstract

Background: Adequate sleep is important for hospitalised patients, yet often disrupted by poor sleep hygiene. Limited research exists on sleep quality and contributing factors in general hospital wards, and reliable assessment tools are lacking. This study aimed to cross-culturally validate the Verran and Snyder-Halpern Sleep Scale (VSH) and the Factors Influencing Sleep Questionnaire (FISQ), assessing their psychometric properties among Dutch hospital patients, and evaluate patients sleep quality in general wards. Methods: A cross-sectional validation study included patients from internal medicine and surgical wards in six Dutch teaching hospitals. The VSH and the FISQ underwent a forward-backward translation process and were validated following COSMIN guidelines, including Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Sleep quality and hygiene were measured with the VSH (visual analogue scale) and FISQ (5-point Likert scale). Associations between patient characteristics and sleep hygiene factors were analysed using regression analyses. Results: A total of 693 respondents completed the questionnaire. Over half were aged 50−74 years and stayed in multi-occupancy rooms for more than four nights. Most (51%; n = 354) reported poorer sleep than at home. Reported disturbances included uncomfortable beds, pain, noisy ventilation, patient noise and equipment alarms. CFA revealed a three-factor model for the VSH and a one-factor model for the FISQ. Regression analysis showed daytime sleep was linked to more disturbance (β = 0,13[0,03, 0,23]) and lower sleep effectiveness (β = −0,11[−0,19, −0,03]). Fewer sleep hours were associated with lower sleep effectiveness (β = 0,57[0,48, 0,66]) and increased disturbance (β = −0,59[−0,67, −0,5]). More frequent sleep interruptions were associated with higher sleep disturbance (β = −0,22[−0,3, −0,15]) and increased need for sleep supplementation (β = −0,11[−0,21, 0]). Conclusions: The Dutch VSH and FISQ are valid, reliable tools for assessing sleep quality and hygiene. Despite measured suboptimall sleep conditions, these tools offer valuable insights for targeted improvements in hospital sleep hygiene.

Suggested Citation

  • Christel T A J Derks & Jessica J J Cramer-Kruit & Paul Lodder & RENurse Consortium & Annemarie J B M de Vos & Catharina J van Oostveen, 2026. "A cross-sectional validation study of the verran and snyder-halpern sleep scale and the factors influencing sleep questionnaire in Dutch hospitals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354633
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354633
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354633&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.