IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354614.html

Evaluating the performance of EEG based on ANN to predict the effectiveness of tDCS combined evaluative conditioning on obsession symptoms reduction in contamination OCD patients: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Fateme Asadollahzadeh Shamkhal
  • Ali Moghimi
  • Hamid Reza Kobravi
  • Javad Salehi Fadardi
  • Faezeh Raeis Al Mohaddesin

Abstract

Over 40% of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) patients do not respond to common treatments. This study was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial, for predictability of effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) with Contamination-Based OCD (C-OCD) using artificial neural networks (ANN) and electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Out of 54 C-OCD patients, 48 were randomized into 4 groups. Using a 2 × 2 factorial design, each group received a combined intervention (real or sham) based on tDCS and Disgust Reduction Evaluative Conditioning (DREC) in 10 sessions. Evaluations included the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and EEG recordings at rest (eyes open). Among the various features extracted from EEG (Fuzzy Synchronization Likelihood (FSL), Power Spectrum, and Recurrence Quantification Analysis (RQA), the Relief algorithm identified appropriate features based on intervention effectiveness for each frequency band and group allocation. The obsessive symptoms reduction was predicted using appropriate features, the fully connected feedforward network and Radial Basis Functions (RBF) networks. The ANN inputs were the appropriate features extracted from the EEG signal before the interventions. To predict the effectiveness level, the Y-BOCS change score (pre- to post-intervention) was given to the models as the desired output. Both networks had the best results for the first three proposed Relief features. The fully connected feedforward network optimized by Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO) achieved the best predictive performance with an average RMSE 0.57 ± 0.4. Based on the calculated error and comparison with Y-BOCS change intervals, EEG data from C-OCD patients combined with ANN effectively predicted the extent to which each type of intervention can change patients’ Y-BOCS score. So, the therapist can decide whether to perform or select each type of intervention for the patient before starting treatment. Our findings confirm the feasibility of using pre-intervention EEG signals combined with ANN to predict individual responses in C-OCD patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Fateme Asadollahzadeh Shamkhal & Ali Moghimi & Hamid Reza Kobravi & Javad Salehi Fadardi & Faezeh Raeis Al Mohaddesin, 2026. "Evaluating the performance of EEG based on ANN to predict the effectiveness of tDCS combined evaluative conditioning on obsession symptoms reduction in contamination OCD patients: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354614
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354614
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354614&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.