Impressions and perceived barriers of implementing water-based foam and nitrogen foam swine depopulation methods at the farm level

Animal depopulation is a critical component of emergency planning across U.S. livestock industries. Class A water-based foam (WBF) and high-expansion nitrogen foam (N2F) have been researched to help provide the swine industry with alternative tools to perform depopulation at larger scales. At this time, there is little data on perceived advantages or barriers identified by individuals, such as operation owners and employees, who would be closely involved in the initial phase of depopulation. Our aim was to survey farm personnel to gather logistics-focused insight upon viewing WBF and N2F demonstrations. Survey questions reflected method-specific difficulties scored using a 4-point Likert scale, along with respondent demographics and free response comments. Select survey sections were analyzed using multivariable linear regression models. Other sections, demographic data, and free response comments are presented descriptively. Data from 51 WBF and 76 N2F surveys were available, with 121 responses disclosing career position. Average (± SD) respondent age was 49.9 (± 13.2) years, with 22.3 (± 16.0) years for average experience in the swine industry. Respondents consisted of 42.2% (51/121) veterinarians, 32.2% (39/121) other farm staff, 13.2% (16/121) owners of their organization, 9.1% (11/121) animal handlers, and 3.3% (4/121) classified as “other”. Depopulation method was the only variable of interest associated with differences in scores for performing tasks and method implementation, with N2F perceived as more difficult than WBF (P