IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354386.html

Ionospheric TEC anomalies analysis and prediction during six volcanic eruptions using a Hybrid ML-DL model and comparison with the AR/MLR Models

Author

Listed:
  • R Mukesh
  • S Logesh
  • Sarat C Dass
  • G Cynthia
  • M Sudhandra
  • K Sivaprabha
  • T Annu Regha
  • S Kiruthiga

Abstract

Eruption of volcanoes is associated with the emission of great energy through the propagation of atmospheric waves up into space. These waves cause significant disturbances in the ionosphere, a region that contains a large number of ions and electrons and is important in providing communications through radio waves and satellites. Disturbances may cause the formation of Equatorial Plasma Bubbles and low-density pockets, leading to signal distortion, time delays, and sometimes, loss of signals in satellites. The Global Positioning System (GPS) becomes inaccurate due to these disturbances since GPS uses information on the positions of user locations. Satellite-based services like the internet and telephony may be affected by the disturbances in the ionosphere caused by a high number of electrons. Prediction of these disturbances makes it possible to plan ways of mitigating against them during future eruptions. Total Electron Content (TEC) data used in this research were mainly obtained from the BAKO station in Indonesia, in addition to other latitudes, in order to prove the universality of the model. The Hybrid Machine Learning and Deep Learning (ML-DL) Model, which is a combination of Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM) algorithms, was designed based on a weighted average and applied in forecasting TEC values. Performance of the model was compared with other independent models, i.e., individual LightGBM and LSTM, as well as the conventional Autoregressive (AR) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) models. Four evaluation measures were used in evaluating the performance of models. This study aims to assess the performance of the Hybrid ML-DL Model in predicting TEC during ionospheric disturbances caused by volcanic eruptions. TEC prediction was done in six major eruptions, including Mt. Kelud (2014), Mt. Sinabung (2016), Mt. Semeru (2021), Mt. Ruang (2024), Mt. Etna (2013), and Mt. La Soufriere (2021). The Hybrid ML-DL Model consistently performs better than the individual LightGBM and LSTM models and the traditional AR and MLR models in predicting TEC values. For example, during the Mt. Ruang eruption, which was the highest eruption disturbance analyzed with a maximum disturbance of 100–110 TECU between April 16th and May 7th, 2024, the Hybrid ML-DL Model scored an RMSE of 2.841 TECU, which was much lower than RMSE values of LightGBM (3.484 TECU), LSTM (5.084 TECU), MLR (5.345 TECU) and AR Model (6.285 TECU). The Hybrid ML-DL Model showed the least value in three performance evaluation criteria, including NRMSE (0.030), MBD (0.546 TECU), and RLE (0.069) among other models.

Suggested Citation

  • R Mukesh & S Logesh & Sarat C Dass & G Cynthia & M Sudhandra & K Sivaprabha & T Annu Regha & S Kiruthiga, 2026. "Ionospheric TEC anomalies analysis and prediction during six volcanic eruptions using a Hybrid ML-DL model and comparison with the AR/MLR Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-59, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354386
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354386
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354386&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.