IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354378.html

Evaluation of forage oat cultivars for alpine saline-alkaline environments: Trade-offs between yield, quality and stability

Author

Listed:
  • Yangji Jia
  • Haiying Zhang
  • Fengjuan Xue
  • Hao Sun
  • Xiaoli Wei
  • Xiaojian Pu
  • Yuanyuan Zhao
  • Chengti Xu

Abstract

Oat cultivation in the alpine saline-alkaline Qaidam Basin requires cultivars that balance yield, quality, and stability. Identifying suitable cultivars is key to sustainable forage production. Three oat cultivars (‘Qinghai 444’, ‘Qingtian No. 1', and ‘Zhengshi No. 1’) were evaluated in a two-year (2024 and 2025) field trial. We measured agronomic traits, yield, photosynthetic parameters, and forage quality. Mixed linear models, correlation analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to assess genotypic effects, environmental stability, and trait relationships. Cultivars exhibited distinct strategies. ‘Zhengshi No. 1’ achieved the highest fresh yield (3.29 and 1.96 t/ha) linked to greater stem diameter and photosynthetic rates but with high environmental sensitivity. ‘Qingtian No. 1’ provided stable, superior forage quality (highest crude protein: 11.44% and 10.33%). ‘Qinghai 444’ showed the most stable agronomic performance and highest water-use efficiency. Key trade-offs were identified, including a negative correlation between yield-related traits and forage quality (Relative Feed Value). The choice of optimal cultivar depends on primary goals: ‘Zhengshi No. 1’ for maximum biomass, ‘Qingtian No. 1’ for high quality, and ‘Qinghai 444’ for reliable performance under variable conditions. This provides an actionable framework for cultivar selection in saline-alkaline regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yangji Jia & Haiying Zhang & Fengjuan Xue & Hao Sun & Xiaoli Wei & Xiaojian Pu & Yuanyuan Zhao & Chengti Xu, 2026. "Evaluation of forage oat cultivars for alpine saline-alkaline environments: Trade-offs between yield, quality and stability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354378
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354378&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.