IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354361.html

Completeness of death registration in Ghana: An evaluation of multiple data sources and methods

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Agyei-Asabere
  • Ayaga Agula Bawah
  • Faustina Frempong-Ainguah
  • Jill Baumgartner
  • Samuel Agyei-Mensah
  • Emmanuel Botchway
  • Victor Sowah Abordo
  • Majid Ezzati

Abstract

Introduction: The lack of a robust and comprehensive civil registration system undermines efforts to develop policies that address emerging health issues in a population. While Ghana has made significant strides in birth registration, progress in death registration has lagged despite the system’s introduction in 1888. Death records are dispersed across institutions and hampered by weak coordination and inconsistent data sharing. The study aims to evaluate the completeness of death registration using both demographic and empirical methods. Methods: We assessed the quality of mortality data using demographic methods and further applied Death Distribution Methods (DDM) as well as the Empirical Completeness Method (ECM) to evaluate the completeness of death registration from the 2022 mortality register and two rounds of population and housing censuses. Findings: Age reporting ranged between fairly accurate and rough, with noticeable under-reporting of under-five deaths. Death registration completeness was estimated at 28.7 percent and 56 percent using the ECM and DDM, respectively. DDM results reveal that male completeness was highest (101%) in the Volta Region and lowest (42%) in the Western Region, while female completeness was highest in Upper East (89%) and lowest in Western (35%) regions. Sub-national variations in completeness were further highlighted by the ECM, with completeness ranging from nearly 70 percent in Greater Accra to barely 8 percent in the Oti Region. Conclusions: The study revealed that completeness of death registration remains low and incomplete, with minimal improvement over the past two decades. The findings underscore the urgent need to adopt innovative, targeted and coordinated approaches to improve completeness, ensuring Ghana can meet international commitments such as SDG 17.19.2.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Agyei-Asabere & Ayaga Agula Bawah & Faustina Frempong-Ainguah & Jill Baumgartner & Samuel Agyei-Mensah & Emmanuel Botchway & Victor Sowah Abordo & Majid Ezzati, 2026. "Completeness of death registration in Ghana: An evaluation of multiple data sources and methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354361
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354361
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354361&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.