IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354358.html

“We’ll have to see how it works”: An interview study to understand collaborative practices in interdisciplinary artificial intelligence and healthcare research

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Henkin
  • Elizabeth Remfry
  • Duncan J Reynolds
  • Megan Clinch
  • Michael R Barnes

Abstract

Developing artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for healthcare is a collaborative effort, bringing data scientists, clinicians, patients and other stakeholders together. By understanding AI as ‘sociotechnical’ where the social and the technical nature of the work and the models are inseparable, we explore the AI development workflow and how stakeholders navigate the challenges and tensions of sharing and generating knowledge across disciplines. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of 13 semi-structured interviews with participants in early stages of AI-in-healthcare research consortia in the UK. Our findings identify that participants needed to adapt both the tools used for sharing and the information communicated according to their audience, particularly when working with those with a clinical or patient perspective. We identify the novelty of participating in AI research, how AI knowledge is shared, and the inclusion of clinician and patient stakeholder perspectives as key areas within collaborative AI practices in healthcare. These findings highlight that bringing AI into the mix can introduce new obstacles to interdisciplinary work.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Henkin & Elizabeth Remfry & Duncan J Reynolds & Megan Clinch & Michael R Barnes, 2026. "“We’ll have to see how it works”: An interview study to understand collaborative practices in interdisciplinary artificial intelligence and healthcare research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354358
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354358&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.