Author
Listed:
- Alexandra Guttentag
- Smrithi Sukumar
- Jeroen van Meijgaard
- Khurram Nasir
- Harlan Krumholz
- Haider J Warraich
Abstract
Background: As healthcare costs and patient cost-sharing continue to rise in the United States, little is known about patients’ understanding of healthcare pricing, insurance-related expenses, and cost-planning strategies. Objective: To assess healthcare cost literacy (HCL) among U.S. adults and identify domains in which patients report the greatest and least confidence in understanding healthcare costs. Methods: A total of 2,308 American adults were surveyed. A cross-sectional design was utilized, incorporating a 12-item survey that examined key dimensions of healthcare cost literacy (HCL), such as healthcare cost knowledge, health insurance cost knowledge, and proactive cost planning behaviors. Results: Participants reported knowing most about pharmacy-level price differences for prescription drugs (77%) and how to contest a hospital bill (56%); they reported knowing least about hospital chargemasters (33%). When asked to describe various healthcare terms, participants found it easiest to describe “deductible” (mean 2.85 [SD 0.83]) and hardest to describe “health insurance formulary” (mean 2.10 [SD 0.96]). Regarding preemptive cost planning, participants had the most difficulty with knowing the cost of an emergency room visit ahead of time (mean 2.19 [SD 0.98]) and found it easiest to know the out-of-pocket cost of a prescription drug ahead of time (mean 2.60 [SD 0.87]). Participants with high-HCL, defined as those with>median HCL score of 2.42, were more likely to be older, have greater health literacy, and be more confident in managing their healthcare (all p
Suggested Citation
Alexandra Guttentag & Smrithi Sukumar & Jeroen van Meijgaard & Khurram Nasir & Harlan Krumholz & Haider J Warraich, 2026.
"Healthcare cost literacy in the united states: Cross-sectional estimates from a representative national sample,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-8, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0354341
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354341
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.