IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354293.html

In Vitro liposome release profile prediction using explainable machine learning approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Hamza Abu Owida
  • Sameer Ahmad Hasan
  • Areen Arabiat
  • Suhaila Abuowaida

Abstract

Formulation features and test settings influence liposomal in vitro release (IVR) profiles, yet it is challenging to examine these multivariable associations across varied literature data. We created an explainable computational workflow in this proof-of-concept study for classifying liposomal release phenotypes and identify formulation/assay features linked to slow and fast release. Benchmarking kinetic models, simulating Weibull-parameterized release curves on a shared 0–168 h grid, clustering profiles using PCA and k-means, and training supervised classifiers on formulation and IVR descriptors were all done using a publicly available Accelerated IVR dataset. Slow, moderate, and fast kinetic phenotypes were found using PCA-k-means; 98.4% of the variance was explained by the first two principal components. XGBoost demonstrated the best cross-validated performance across evaluated models for the extreme slow-versus-fast subgroup (n = 59); however, class-wise recall and precision indicate preliminary rather than conclusive prediction performance. The most informative descriptors identified by feature selection and SHAP interpretation were media pH, drug loading, weighted lipid transition temperature, and media temperature. These results indicated that risk-based IVR technique development and hypothesis creation for liposomal formulations can be supported by explainable ML; nevertheless, prior to translational or regulatory usage, prospective validation on independently generated datasets is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamza Abu Owida & Sameer Ahmad Hasan & Areen Arabiat & Suhaila Abuowaida, 2026. "In Vitro liposome release profile prediction using explainable machine learning approaches," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354293
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354293
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354293&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.